BEAT Logo BEAT Banner
   
   
pink flowers
The BEAT News

July 10, 2008

pink flowers
Follow all the environmental news and events in Berkshire County delivered to you computer weekly.
Subscribe to The BEAT News by email. (follow link and click on subscribe)

In the News

CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Environmental Monitor
Public Notices Alphabetically by town
The BEAT News Archives

Advocacy News (Includes how to reach your legislators)

DEP Enforcement Actions In The Berkshires

return to top

Help Count Turkey Families

Sportsmen and -women, birders, landowners and other wildlife enthusiasts are encouraged to assist MassWildlife to count turkey families this summer. MassWildlife conducts an annual wild turkey brood survey from June through August. "The brood survey serves as a long term index on reproduction," explains Jim Cardoza, MassWildlife's Turkey Project Leader. "It helps us determine overall productivity and allows us to compare rates of reproduction over a long period of time." Cardoza also points out that citizen involvement in this survey is a cost-effective means of gathering useful data, and he encourages all interested people to participate.

A turkey brood survey form has been posted on the front page of  MassWildlife's website. Information needed includes date, town, number of hens seen, and number of poults (young turkeys) and their relative size compared to the hens. Multiple sightings of the same brood should also be noted. The survey period runs from June 1 - August 31. The last two years of survey data is posted in the Wild turkey area of the website.

Completed forms should to be mailed to the MassWildlife Westborough Field Headquarters, 1 Rabbit Hill Rd, Westboro, MA 01581.

return to top

Northern Berkshire Take Charge Campaign

When North Adams installed solar trash compactors on main street, the mayor commented that we had done all this without a green committee.  Its true, North Adams doesn't have a 'green committee', but it does have a group of residents passionate about energy efficiency.  Since Williams and MCLA students brought environmental justice and economic opportunities in the clean energy economy to a Northern Berkshire Community Coalition forum, the community here has started to take energy use seriously.  And since the rapid escalation of the price of energy, so has everyone else.   CET and NBCC have helped form a North Adams partnership of community, business, government and non-profits has come together to tackle the issue head-on.

In August, North Adams, and possibly other towns, will launch the Take Charge campaign to Save Energy.  This campaign focuses on 5 basic steps that every resident should take, no matter what their income level (indeed, the lower the income the more urgent these are) to reduce their home energy use.  The steps are no-cost to low-cost, and they culminate in #5, getting a home energy audit which connects people to programs, rebates and loans already in place.  The point is to target a truly broad audience and bring people in who don't have any attachment to the word green or scary ecological issues.

We'll have an informational brochure that asks people to sign up in return for a starter kit (light bulb, clothesline, information).  They can turn those in at the LEED certified library, where we'll also have a display with lighting and thermostats and home energy packs which include a watt-o-meter, a tire pressure gauge and a hot water heater thermometer.  In addition, we'll schedule information sessions at the library for residents to learn how to winterize homes, and we'll even be giving away home energy meters as prizes to everyone who's signed up for the campaign.

We often think of environmental justice as negatively impacting the health of people living near toxics, which is a very important issue.  But we often forget that access to information and technology to make a positive difference is an equally important issue of justice.  The problem of energy is one that will rapidly force us to confront our relationship with the ecological world whether we like to or not, and the last thing we need is low-income residents avoiding light bulbs or other energy savings because they don't want to seem like an environmentalist.  Rather, what the Take Charge campaign is doing, is meeting people where they're at and putting the tools in their hands to achieve energy independence in the short term. 

Stay tuned for more updates.  If you'd like materials for the Take Charge campaign or you would be interested in running this campaign in your area, or want to help out, please contact either Morgan Goodwin (morgan.goodwin@gmail.com) or Nancy Nylen (nancyn@cetonline.org). 

return to top

Household hazardous waste collection planned in Lee 

On Saturday, July 12, the Center for Ecological Technology (CET) will conduct a comprehensive household hazardous waste collection from 9 a.m. to noon at the Lee DPW, 45 Railroad Street.  The collection is for south Berkshire towns. Businesses may participate for a fee.
 
All manner of household hazardous waste will be accepted—including oil-based paints, stains, varnishes, thinners, solvent adhesives, lighter fluid, fuels, antifreeze, polishes, pool chemicals, insecticides, fertilizers and weed killers, moth balls, poisons, flea control products, rubber cement, photo chemicals, chemistry sets, artist supplies, mercury thermometers and thermostats, compact and tube fluorescent lamps and much more.

Pre-registration with CET is required for the collection.

This program is sponsored by the 15 towns that form the South Berkshire Household Hazardous Waste Collaborative.  The participating towns are: Alford, Becket, Egremont, Great Barrington, Lee, Lenox, Monterey, Mount Washington, New Marlborough, Otis, Richmond, Sheffield, Stockbridge, Tyringham and West Stockbridge. 

Latex paint will not be accepted at either event.  Empty or dried-up cans of latex paint can be disposed with the regular trash.  Empty cans of oil-based paint, stains and solvents can be disposed with the regular trash as well. Usable paint can be given away through freecycle.org or some non-profits. 

To pre-register or for information about what can be brought to either of these collections, visit www.cetonline.org or email amandad@cetonline.org . Or call Amanda at 413-445-4556 ext. 17.  Residents from communities that are not participating should call their City or Town Hall for information about household hazardous product collections.

CET is a non-profit organization working in the fields of energy efficiency, renewable energy, waste management and environmental education. CET provides practical solutions that make sense for our community, economy and environment. CET is funded in part by the Massachusetts Cultural Council. 

return to top

Executive Director, Hoosic River Watershed Association

The Hoosic River Watershed Association seeks an Executive Director (20 hours per week).  HooRWA, a non-profit organization based in Williamstown, MA, champions restoration, conservation and enjoyment of the watershed through education, research, and advocacy. Reporting to the Board of Directors, the ED is responsible for ensuring that the goals of the association are met and maintaining a financially viable organization. 

The primary responsibilities include determining organizational priorities in consultation with the Board; developing educational, advocacy and research programs; coordinating events, writing grant proposals; preparing newsletters; coordinating annual membership / fundraising campaigns; supervising HooRWA staff and volunteers; acting as spokesperson for the organization and performing administrative tasks.  A full job description and other information can be found at hoorwa.org.

The successful candidate will be familiar with watershed issues, able to work independently, and have excellent communication skills. A demonstrated interest in environmental or community related issues through educational background and/or work experience is preferred.  Familiarity with MS Word, Access, Quickbooks, and Dream Weaver a plus.

As a part-time job, this position does not provide benefits.

HooRWA is an equal opportunity employer.

Please send cover letter and resume to:  

John Case
President, HooRWA
1739 Green River Road
Williamstown, MA 01267
413-458-8023

Or jocase@adelphia.net

return to top

From Amy Cotler's "Fresh and Company" newsletter:

Rent Free land for local CSA available

Hilltop Orchards, in Richmond, MA, is offering to provide farmland on rent-free lease to an individual or group, to be used for a CSA farm (community supported agriculture). Hilltop Orchards has land available to be farmed and is also willing to share farming equipment from their apple orchard operation.  They have an existing store at the property where the CSA shares can be distributed and other produce sold.  free wine tasting. Contact: John Vittori - Owner 413-822-1681 Hilltop Orchards Richmond, MA 01254

Local Author Published On-Line Book - The Politics of Farming—moving agriculture from commodity to community, by Billie Best, an Alford resident.  

“I have written a very short book (75 pages) about the politics of farming. It connects the dots between issues that may seem unrelated, but together form a complete picture of what's gone wrong with farming, and how challenges to farms are symptomatic of the larger challenges facing our planet. As a new farmer I discovered a few simple ideas I think everyone should understand: the limits of growth, the principle of sustainability, the fallacy of cheap, and the three kinds of wealth. I believe in farming. I believe farming can transform the planet by cleaning the environment, feeding people, and building stable communities. But after a few years trying to farm in a world run by suits, I don’t think that promise can be fulfilled unless we change the way the world works. Please join me in seeding this revolution.” For the book, visit: http://www.billiebest.com/

return to top

Poisoned for Pennies: A New Book on the Economics of Toxics & Precaution

The misuse of cost-benefit analysis is impeding efforts to protect and clean up our environment, especially in the case of toxic chemicals. However, there is an alternative, precautionary approach to making decisions under uncertainty.

Join us in celebrating the release of a new book: Poisoned for Pennies: The Economics of Toxics and Precaution by Frank Ackerman of the Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University.

When: July 16th, 7-9 pm

Where: Stockholm Environment Institute
11 Curtis Avenue
Somerville, MA 02144-1224, USA
(near Tufts University)

Visit the event website for directions

Book reading and signing featuring author Frank Ackerman.

According to Ackerman, conservatives-in elected office, in state and federal regulatory agencies, and in businesses of every size-have argued repeatedly that environmental clean-up and protection are simply too expensive. But as he proves, that is untrue in case after case. The book ranges from psychological research to risk analysis to the benefits of aggressive pesticide regulation, and from mad cow disease to vinyl siding. You can't afford not to read it!

Light refreshments will be served

To RSVP contact Namasha Schelling at 617-338-8131 ext 204 RSVPs appreciated but walk-ins welcome.

Co-sponsored by the Alliance for a Healthy Tomorrow, Representative Paul Donato, and Senator Patricia Jehlen

return to top

News from the Environmental League of Massachusetts

Sweeping Energy Bill Enacted

Governor Patrick signed comprehensive energy legislation that lays a strong foundation for a transition from fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy sources. Speaker DiMasi authored the original bill and made passage of energy legislation a top priority this session. The final bill is the result of over a year of hard work by many people.

Joining the Governor for the signing ceremony at the Museum of Science were Speaker DiMasi, Senate President Murray, Energy Committee Co-Chairs Senator Michael Morrissey and Rep. Brian Dempsey, EEA Secretary Bowles, and environmental leaders, including ELM President George Bachrach.

The legislation:

  • Requires electricity providers to significantly increase investments in energy efficiency and demand management programs.
  • Requires that 15% of Massachusetts energy sales come from clean, renewable energy sources by 2020.
  • Requires that new development comply with strict building energy codes.
  • Establishes a Green Communities program to provide financial assistance to cities and towns for energy efficiency and conservation projects.
  • Requires that 100% of pollution allowances established under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) be auctioned and the proceeds used primarily for efficiency measures.

This is truly an important milestone for the state and will considerably boost current efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution and attract green jobs to the state.  

Global Warming Solutions Act

Coincidentally, on the same day that the Energy Bill was signed, more than 150 activists rallied on the State House steps, calling on the legislature to pass the Global Warming Solutions Act. The Act would set enforceable targets on greenhouse gas emissions in the short and long-term and includes a goal of 80% reduction in emissions below 1990 levels by 2050.  

Speakers included Senator Marc Pacheco, who sponsored the legislation which has already passed the Senate, Reps. Frank Smizik and Will Brownsberger, Kevin Knobloch, President of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Rob Garrity, Executive Director of Mass. Climate Action Network. The gathering called for the legislature to pass the bill - which will give the state regulatory authority over all sources of greenhouse gas emissions - before the legislative session ends on July 31st.

ELM and our colleagues in the Mass. Climate Coalition will be working hard to push this bill during the next few weeks. Please stay tuned as we may be calling on you to contact House members to urge their support.

This legislation is a perfect complement to the Energy Bill. If we are successful in getting it passed this session, Massachusetts will join a number of other states leading the nation on this most critical issue. 

Bond Bill

No movement yet on the bond bill. It remains before House Ways and Means, but we still expect the bill to be signed into law before the end of the session.  Again, stay tuned during these last few weeks when we may need a final push. For up-to-date information and bill text go to http://www.envirobond.org

Conservation Tax Incentives

Environmental groups met with senior staff in Speaker DiMasi's office yesterday in an effort to get the bill approved by the House so that the Senate can take it up. Given that the legislation has previously passed in the Senate, we are confident that the Senate is poised to vote on the bill before the session ends if the House takes action. The bill would provide a tax credit to landowners who donate ecologically valuable land to the state or a nonprofit conservation organization.

Public Lands Preservation Act

This legislation is still stuck in the House Ways and Means Committee.  However, we are hearing from legislators that they have been contacted by constituents about the bill so we want to keep the pressure on. As you know, the bill states that any change in use or disposition of protected open space should take place ONLY when there is no feasible alternative and if replacement land of equivalent acreage and market value is provided. If you haven't yet contacted your representative, please do. More information can be found at http://www.protectmassenvironment.org/public_lands_preservation_act.htm

Green Jobs

In addition to the energy legislation, Speaker DiMasi also recently introduced a "Green Jobs" bill that would provide resources for clean energy research and development and related workforce development. The Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies will hear the bill on Monday, July 7th at noon in Gardner Auditorium at the State House.

ELM President George Bachrach will be testifying in favor of the bill.

return to top


Putting a cap on the bottled water industry

By Amy Vickers  | (This article first appeared in the Boston Globe Op-Ed July 7, 2008)

OVER A half-billion dollars of Massachusetts' taxpayer money will be spent this year on clean drinking water program loans to communities, yet Beacon Hill has been strangely silent about - and invested not one penny in defense of - small- and often low-income rural towns that stand alone against what many see as a threat to their drinking water supplies: Swiss-based Nestlé Waters.

Nestlé, the old candy company that once spawned an international boycott of its products for proffering cheap infant formula as better than mother's milk to women in developing countries, now profits from what many say is sullying another sacred solution: the bottling of pristine waters. It may soon do this in some of the state's most water-stressed and fragile communities.

For more than a year, Nestlé and its well drillers, technical consultants, and lawyers have been quietly surveying the profit potential in the few remaining unspoiled springs and aquifers in Central and Western Massachusetts. In its attempts to strike blue gold, the firm has aggressively pursued water extraction deals that have many locals seeing red.

Two recent efforts by Nestlé to pursue pumping operations in small towns illustrate why withdrawals for commercial water bottling operations in our state pose unacceptable risks, not only to local drinking water supplies, but also to such natural assets as fisheries and conservation land. Last summer, Montague residents halted - at least for now -Nestlé's pursuit of the spring water beneath Montague Plains, a state wildlife management area that also recharges critical ground water for a state fish hatchery and the local wells on which many homes and farms depend.

This spring, after considerable public outcry, Clinton town officials appeared to have finally rejected Nestlé's bid to extract and export up to a quarter-million gallons of spring water a day - equal to 4 million servings of some of the cleanest drinking water in the state - from the nearly 600-acre Wekepeke Reservation land that Clinton owns in the town of Sterling. The offer posed several legal issues, not least the fact that Clinton's 19th-century water rights to the Wekepeke are for surface water - not spring water - and only for town public water supply needs.

Clinton stopped using Wekepeke water in the 1960s and the town is now supplied by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority. Sterling residents, 70 percent of whom rely on the Wekepeke for ground water to supply their home wells, were incensed and asked why another town would have the right to literally sell the water beneath their feet for global export to the highest bidder.

Since when has Massachusetts enjoyed a surplus of pristine drinking water supplies that multinational firms, not Bay State citizens, are considered more deserving to receive? The state classifies 70 percent of state river drainage basins as "flow-stressed." Since when have they been restored to such good health that we now have a surfeit of naturally clean freshwater ready for shipping to bottle-chugging out-of-staters - and this in an era in which we face unprecedented global warming, increased agricultural irrigation needs, and worsening water pollution, which requires skyrocketing treatment costs?

Leaders in government, business, religious, and spiritual movements across America are increasingly rejecting bottled water because of its indefensible environmental costs. It is time that this state also calls a halt to the aggressive intrusions of the bottled water industry into the vulnerable water sources that supply small-town homes, farms, and public conservation lands.

The Legislature should place an immediate statewide moratorium of at least two years on new bottled water extractions along with a cap on existing withdrawals.

In the meantime, an assessment of the state's available water supplies and needs - coupled with long-term climate change forecasts - must be made. Further, a statewide law must be enacted that affirms that the waters of Massachusetts shall be protected in perpetuity for its inhabitants, first and foremost, and that communities and aquifer protection areas may ban out-of-state water exports.

Unless it can be proven that Massachusetts has water to spare, there is no time to waste in stopping the bottled water industry from draining our most prized and irreplaceable sources of clean drinking water.

Copyright: Amy Vickers, 2008 - Amy lives in Amherst, is an engineer and water conservation consultant. 

Here is an alert from Amy:

Dear All,

Thank you for calling or emailing me about my op-ed in yesterday's Boston Globe, "Putting a cap on the bottled water industry." I have been happily overwhelmed and amazed at how many people in Massachusetts and around the country care deeply about the threats posed by the bottled water industry's massive freshwater extractions from our communities. We know action is required - and soon.

I have some wonderful news that I received just within the past hour that I want to share with you, and then I have an important request....

Great news: The Joint Committee on the Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture at the Massachusetts State House is very interested in holding an oversight committee hearing on these issues! Today I spoke with Zak Crowley, Research Director for the Joint Committee on the Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture at the Massachusetts State House. Rep. Smizik is the House Chair of that Committee. I then spoke with Shannon Ames at Senator Pam Resor's office - Sen. Resor is the Senate Chair of that Committee. Shortly after speaking with Zak and Shannon they emailed me back (below) that both Chairman  Smizik and Chairman Resor are supportive of pursuing an oversight hearing on the issue of bottled water extractions.

Yahooo!!!

Here's your part: You and everyone you know who cares about this issue needs to call and/or email your support for this public hearing to Rep.  Smizik and Sen. Resor and their staffers Zak Crowley and Shannon Ames. They need to know all the reasons why this hearing is important - for this fall - and what the hearing agenda should include. My op-ed includes just some of the reasons, I know you have more.

Here is the contact information:

Rep. Smizik, tel# 617-722-2210, email: Rep.FrankSmizik@hou.state.ma.us)
Zak Crowley, Comm. Research Dir, tel# (617) 722-2210 , email: Zachary.Crowley@state.ma.us
Sen. Resor  tel# (617) 722-1120,  email: Pamela.Resor@state.ma.us)
Shannon Ames, Environment,  tel# (617) 722-1120,  email: Shannon.Ames@state.ma.us

Spread the word!

Amy

return to top

New Massachusetts Outdoor Recreation Map

On July 1, at Walden Pond, Massachusetts environmental officials displayed a new “Massachusetts Outdoor Recreation Map” packed with information for residents and visitors looking for places to enjoy outdoor activities such as fishing, boating, hunting, camping, hiking, wildlife watching, and swimming across the Bay State. The newly revised and updated Massachusetts Outdoor Recreation Map shows conservation lands managed by the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and the Department of Fish and Game’s (DFG) Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. It also identifies all boat access, sport fishing piers, and shore fishing areas built by DFG’s Office of Fishing and Boating Access. There is additional information about outdoor safety and ethics, licensing requirements for fishing and hunting, and web links to further information regarding recreational opportunities on state properties. Officials praised the maps as a great resource for tourists and Massachusetts residents alike.

The Massachusetts Outdoor Recreation Map will be available for free at the DFG and Office of Fishing and Boating offices in Boston, all MassWildlife offices and hatcheries, DCR properties across the state, and selected highway information centers. To obtain a map by postal mail, send a self-addressed 59 cent stamped business sized envelope to: Outdoor Recreation Map, MassWildlife Field Headquarters, 1 Rabbit Hill Rd, Westboro MA 01581. The map is also available online as a pdf

return to top

Basic Hunter Education Course

New hunters of all ages are reminded that it is never too early to sign up for a Basic Hunter Education Course. New hunters in Massachusetts are required to show proof that they have taken a basic hunter education course in order to purchase a hunting or sporting license. Basic courses are available across the state and many begin in August and September.

Massachusetts offered its first hunter safety course in 1954, and to date has graduated more than 169,000 students. Topics covered during the course include safe handling and storage of hunting arms and ammunition, hunting laws and ethics, wildlife identification, wildlife management, care and handling of game, basic survival skills and first aid. Students who successfully pass the course receive a Certificate of Completion that is accepted for purchasing a Massachusetts hunting or sporting license and for people 15 or older making application for a Firearms Identification Card with their local police departments. The certificates are also accepted in all states and Canadian provinces for the purchase of a hunting license.

Information on course locations and schedules is posted on the MassWildlife website under "Education" programs. Graduates who have lost their Certificates may obtain a Duplicate Certificate from the Hunter Education Program through the MassWildlife website or by contacting the office directly at 978/632-7648. 

return to top

Webcast on Proposed NPDES Permits for Vessels

July 2, 2008
12:00-1:30 pm ET

EPA is sponsoring a webcast to explain the contents of the two proposed NPDES permits that would cover discharges from commercial and recreational vessels. As the result of a court ruling, discharges of pollutants incidental to the operation of the vessels will no longer be exempt from the NPDES permit program as of September 30, 2008. In response to this court ruling, EPA has developed two permits covering sources of pollution such as the discharge of gray water and bilge water, and runoff from decks. The webcast will provide an opportunity for the interested public to ask questions about the contents of these proposed permits. The webcast will also help interested parties submit formal public comments on these permits. The public comment period ends on August 1, 2008.

To register for this webcast, please visit the EPA website.

return to top

Dorothy Amos Park river remediation will have public meeting first - not yet scheduled

The remediation of the sediment from the West Branch of the Housatonic River and its riverbanks near Dorothy Amos Park on West Street in Pittsfield should begin sometime in 2008.

As of the end of June, the General Electric Company (GE) has obtained their Environmental Notification Form certificate and National Pollution Discharge Elimination Prevention System (NPDES) permit. They still need their Water Quality permit, Chapter 91 permit, and an Order of Conditions (permit) from the Pittsfield Conservation Commission.

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and GE will hold a public meeting to inform the neighborhood and anyone else who is interested about the project. The City of Pittsfield expects this meeting to be held in Riverview West community meeting room, but the date and time have not been set.

return to top

Unkamet Brook area - what a mess!

The Citizens Coordinating Council (CCC) will get a separate presentation on the Unkamet Brook area - the area that is still loaded with toxic waste and PCBs through which Unkamet Brook flows before emptying into the Housatonic River UPSTREAM of the entire "cleanup" so far - and upstream of the proposed Rest of River cleanup. So there are still PCBs and other toxic chemicals flowing into the Housatonic River up stream of all the work done so far.

When asked why Unkamet Brook wasn't done first, because it was at the top of the pollution flow, Susan Svirsky said that EPA was waiting for the City of Pittsfield because the City is going to be working further upstream in Unkamet Brook and they wanted to coordinate with the City. They will have a meeting with the City soon. BEAT would comment that this coordination had absolutely nothing to do with why the EPA didn't require GE to start with Unkamet Brook. As Dean Tagliaferro of EPA said, it had to do with cleaning non-GE-owned lands first. When the City proposed work on Unkamet Brook a year or two ago, BEAT contacted the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to make sure the work would be coordinated with the GE/EPA/DEP work on Unkamet Brook. We were afraid that the work the city was proposing might alter the flow of Unkamet Brook through the contaminated area and release even more contamination into the Housatonic River. At the time GE was not required to even measure the flow of Unkamet Brook. Now they are, thanks to environmental groups requests.

The Unkamet Brook area is a mess. GE will divide this 140 acre area into two parts to do the remediation. Part of the area has numerous buildings (General Dynamics, Sabic, and the US Army). Part is mostly wetlands, the brook, an old toxic landfill.

There is Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL) = PCB laden oil - that is being and will need to be extracted from the groundwater. Currently GE is extracting about 100 - 150 gallons per year of NAPL in this area. There are different standards for how clean the groundwater needs to be depending on whether it is near a building or flows to the Housatonic River.

The plan is to cap the old toxic landfill. Numerous members of the CCC commented that this is a very bad idea. BEAT would like to point out that this will be yet another capped toxic landfill in Pittsfield that is in a wetland whose water eventually flows to the Housatonic River. Because the wetland's water eventually flows to the Housatonic River, GE is required to remediate the wetland to a lower (fewer PCBs) standard, but the land fill stays.

Part of Unkamet Brook will be rerouted.

There will be much more discussion about Unkamet Brook Area in the future!

return to top

Silver Lake - Toxic Fish - USFWS won't do habitat restoration

US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) gave a presentation on Silver Lake. USFWS will be removing all the largest fish from Silver Lake - these large fish are so contaminated with PCBs that they will be disposed of out-of-state at a toxic waste facility. Also, all non-native fish such as goldfish and carp will be removed.

USFWS refused to do any habitat restoration because they would have been liable if the cap failed because of the restoration and they felt it was likely that the plants would penetrate the cap. (Which is what the environmental groups said all along!) This lack of habitat restoration will require yet another modification to the Consent Decree - and yet everytime the environmental groups want a change to better protect the environment or the people of Pittsfield or those who live near or use the Housatonic River, we are told that any change would not be possible because everything is spelled out in the Consent Decree!

return to top

Pittsfield Generating Plant was sold, but not the land

The former Pittsfield Generating Plant was sold, but GE still owns and is liable for the land the plant sits on. See related story.

return to top

GE Corrective Measures Study Comments now on line

EPA has now put all the public comments they received up on-line on the website. You can also view the Corrective Measures Study (CMS) there - the CMS is GE's proposal for remediating the Rest of the River. Much more to come on this story.

return to top

CCC meeting notes in addition to those above

Hill 78 is now 50% capped. The entire east side is full and capped - there is still approximately 15,000 cubic yards of capacity left on the west side for more material as long as it has fewer than 50 parts per million (ppm)of PCBs and is not considered hazardous for other reasons. The sewer and stormwater pipes that ran UNDER Hill 78 have been filled and new lines installed to run around the toxic waste dump. However, the stormwater line empties into a swale that eventually leads to the Housatonic River. BEAT would have preferred that GE be forced to include the new stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) to treat the storm water on site.

There are some areas in the region of Hill 78 between New York Ave, Merrill Road, and General Dynamics that will have more soil removed. One is near New York Ave, the rest are farther east.

More land will be turned over to the Pittsfield Economic Development Authority (PEDA). Six building still need to be demolished. Some of this material will be reused on site so that PEDA will not need to bring in clean fill. The material will have less than 1ppm. The material will be crushed to PEDA's specifications of less than 2" diameter. Other material if less than 50 ppm will go to Hill 78. The rest will go out-of-state.

Buildings in the 60s complex will be removed next year and the site will be remediated. GE estimates they will remove 16,000 cubic yards of material. The 200 foot riverfront area will be "restored" as a buffer - however it will be seeded as a grass buffer, not shrub or tree. This appears to be because there is a cap covering more toxic waste in the riverfront area, so tree or shrub roots could compromise the cap.

Work should begin on some Dalton Ave properties in July 2008.

Work should begin on Commercial Street in fall 2008.

Springside Reservoir - empty, no sediment found to sample. Old 1910 drawing show the pipes from the reservoir. The pipes haven't been used since the 1940s. In 2002, the pipes were plugged back to Building 31.

return to top

Pittsfield Harvest Farmers' Market

EVERY Thursday from June to November, the Pittsfield Harvest Farmers' Market happens on the 400 block of North Street in downtown Pittsfield, Massachusetts, between St. Joe's Church and the Senior Center, from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Rain or Shine!
 
Please come out and support the farmers that maintain our county as the beautiful working landscape it is! The Harvest Market will be a jolt of vibrancy to our downtown every Thursday afternoon during the growing season. In order for it to be successful, we need Pittsfielders and those from the hinterlands to show up and buy some produce. Let's prove to these farmers that Pittsfield is ready to eat local. So, leave the following items off your grocery market list, and come to the Harvest!
 
As the summer progresses the bounty will only grow (including meats, cheeses, and all the veggies you can imagine), but for now plan on finding the following goods:
 
- Greens (many varieties), Spinach, Basil, Strawberries, Tomatoes, Mushrooms, Broccoli, Radishes, Jam, Bread, Flowers, Seedlings, Pies and Desserts, Cheeses, and more!
 
It all comes from the fields and kitchens of your fellow Berkshire citizens: Jaeschke Fruit & Flower Center, Taft Farm, Fallon Farm, Overmeade Farm, Berkshire Harmony Farm, Cricket Creek Farm, River Valley Farm, Nobles Farm, Holiday Farm, Blue Shrooms Mushrooms at Indigo Farm, Pittsfield Rye Bakery, and A. W. Confections.

return to top

Local Student Film with an Environmental Message

This June, the first annual Berkshire Blossom Film Festival took place at the Colonial Theatre in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and offered a 24-hour student filmmaking competition.  Miss Hall's students Charlotte Crane (17), Eliza Chase (17), Caroline Barry (16), Missy Mattoon (17), and Alexa Green (17) entered the competition with their short film Slingshot Sally, starring Charlotte Crane in the title role alongside various friends and family.

Watch the movie.

The required elements for the contest were released at 10 AM on Saturday, June 7, and entries were due by 10 AM on Sunday.  All films required an environmental or activist focus, a commercial business in the Berkshires, the line "Hey, Jack, where's the green?" and the use of either an egg, banana, or twinkie.  The idea for Slingshot Sally had been hatching for about two years, and once the parameters were released the girls worked in the required elements and started shooting by 3 PM.  Shooting lasted until about midnight, when Chase and Green's all-night editing session began.  The DVD was burned at 9 AM Sunday, and was turned into the Colonial by 10 AM.  

Slingshot Sally ended up winning the first prize, much to the surprise of the crew.  Alexa Green said, "The contest was great because it allowed students to really look at environmental problems and solutions, both on a worldwide and local scale.  The films were all really insightful, plus the 24-hour rush is always fun."

return to top

 

MassHighway must come up with a plan to cleanup stormwater runoff (story from theEnvironmental League of Massachusetts)

In a recent landmark court case filed by environmentalists, a federal court judge ruled that the Massachusetts Highway Department violated federal clean water laws by failing to develop an adequate stormwater cleanup plan for its 2,500 miles of urban roads and bridges.

Runoff from storms picks up road surface pollutants, including oil and grease, toxic metals such as zinc, nickel, lead, as well as salt and other de-icing chemicals. These pollutants have been flowing into rivers, streams and lakes, affecting the health of the entire ecosystem.

As a result of the federal ruling, the Massachusetts Highway Department must now commit to a two-year schedule for adopting a revised stormwater pollution cleanup plan, and must also move quickly to address pollution hot spots, such as in Lancaster and the Charles River watershed.  

The court ruling was praised as a landmark decision and a victory for environmentalists and the citizens of Massachusetts by CLF (Conservation Law Foundation), which played a significant role in bringing this issue to legal resolution.

return to top

The Collaboration Prize

Do you know of nonprofits who are collaborating with others or merging altogether? The Collaboration Prize is a new $250,000 award that recognizes such collaborations among two or more nonprofit organizations that each would otherwise provide the same or similar programs or services and compete for clients, financial resources and staff. 

Do you know a nonprofit collaboration that is achieving greater community impact, greater efficiency with resources, or both? If you are familiar with the collaboration and not an employee of any organization involved, you can nominate that collaboration.

The nomination process begins June 1, 2008 and closes at 5 p.m. EDT on July 21, 2008.

Learn more about eligibility and selection criteria.

Find out what you need to do as a nominator.

Download nomination package (eligibility and selection criteria, selection timeline, nominator instructions, and nomination forms).

Register to receive updates so your favorite collaboration doesn’t miss out on $250,000.

Click on http://www.thecollaborationprize.org/ for more info.

return to top

Which switch saves more gas?

A story on NPR had the following question:
Which saves more gas: trading in a 16-mile-a-gallon gas guzzler for a slightly more efficient car that gets 20 mpg? Or going from a gas-sipping sedan of 34-mpg to a hybrid that gets 50 mpg?

You might be tempted to do the following analysis:
16-mile-a-gallon traded in to get a 20-mile-a-gallon is an improvement of 4-mile-a-gallon
34-mile-a-gallon traded in to get a 50-mile-a-gallon is an improvement of 16-mile-a-gallon

It looks like getting the hybrid is 4 times more worthy, but is this the right analysis to be doing?

Here is a different way to look at the problem. One that gives a better picture of the difference in fuel use.

For the same four vehicles, how many gallons per hundred miles does each get?
16-mile-a-gallon uses 6.25 gallons to go 100 miles
20-mile-a-gallon uses 5.00 gallons to go 100 miles
34-mile-a-gallon uses 2.94 gallons to go 100 miles
50-mile-a-gallon uses 2.00 gallons to go 100 miles

So if you trade in the 16-mile-a-gallon to get a 20-mile-a-gallon you save 1.25 gallons for every 100 miles you drive, whereas trading in the 34-mile-a-gallon to get a 50-mile-a-gallon saves only 0.94 gallons for every 100 miles.

The point is that if cars gas mileage figures were in gallons per hundred miles, rather than miles per gallon, it would give us a better idea of how to compare fuel efficiency.

return to top

Proposed Pittsfield Municipal Airport Expansion Less Expansive

According to the Berkshire Eagle, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) decided to narrow the immediate scope of work at Pittsfield Municipal Airport. The FAA cited finite available funding for airports and rising construction costs in announcing its decision. Construction costs are going through the roof! BEAT believes it is unwise and unfair to put so much money into this airport project, which has a huge "carbon footprint" for the number of people served, when the money could be much better spent elsewhere.

The Berkshire Eagle didn't mention anything that was outlined at the recent Pittsfield Municipal Airport Commission meeting* -  that in order to satisfy the deficiencies listed in the March 28, 2008 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) letter they would reduce infringements on the Wampanum Brook watershed. This was a big shift in project scope which consequently reduced the runway extension by 200' and eliminated the RAILS system (Runway Alignment Illumination Sytem) which would have extended 1000' past the present lighting system through wetlands.

The airport may still install the RAILS system at a later date. BEAT urge's DEP to require this possible future project to be looked at now to avoid "segmentation" of this project. Segmentation, or only proposing part of a project at a time, was used in the past by unscrupulous developers, as a way to avoid certain environmental laws. DEP has since put a stop to that practice.

The airport could further reduce the environmental impacts by using Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) at the ends of the runway, but they do not seem inclined to do this.

BEAT does not believe the airport should expand beyond the existing footprint. Albany is, according to the City of Pittsfield's Pittsfield Municipal Airport's web page, 38 miles from Pittsfield. Long and international flights should leave from Albany. The existing footprint with EMAS systems could accommodate much of the same traffic much of the time - just not fully loaded with fuel on very hot or slippery days.

* You can watch the PMA Commission meeting on Pittsfield Community Television's (PCTV) website. Click Watch now.

return to top

Clean Up Underway at 50 East Mill st., Pittsfield, Mass.

A coordinated clean up effort by local, state and federal agencies is working to excavate lead contaminated soil around a fire-damaged vacant mill building at 50 East Mill Street in Pittsfield, Mass. The work is being coordinated between the U.S. EPA, along with the Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) and the City of Pittsfield.   

Demolition of the former mill building present at the site was completed this past May, allowing cleanup crews to more safely excavate and remediate the soil contamination.

In October of 2004 a fire swept though the vacant mill formerly present on site, leaving significant structural damage. Much of the building had collapsed as a result of that initial fire and there was noticeable compromise to the building’s metal support beams.  
This past September of 2007, the mill building suffered an additional but smaller fire causing further damage making the area unsafe for cleanup crews. There were two buildings present at the site, one was the vacant mill and the second was a garage however the garage is not planned for demolition at this point in time. While both buildings had been vacant, site investigators had noted signs of illegal trespassing, further prioritizing that the remainder of the damaged mill be taken down.

Demolition debris and contaminated soil are scheduled for removal by the end of June. The excavated soil will be taken off site by truck, to a CERCLA (Superfund) licensed landfill. The site is located in a predominantly residential neighborhood within a mile of downtown Pittsfield; however EPA, MassDEP and the City of Pittsfield are taking appropriate safety precautions for the surrounding community and do not expect any negative impact to nearby residents. 

More information:

- EPA emergency removal work: (epa.gov/region1/superfund/er)

return to top

Seventh Modification to the Consent Decree

Click here to read the seventh modification to the Consent Decree (pdf) . The modification allows GE's Capital, a subsidiary of GE, to sell the Co-generation Facility located on GE property to Maxim Power. The modification stipulates that GE will remain responsible to implement their obligations under the Consent Decree. GE is not selling any of the land to Maxim Power; they are selling the business and the physical plant and will grant land leases to Maxim Power. Maxim Power is a large utility that own and operates numerous power plants in North America.

BEAT asked about the testing of the well water that this facility uses because General Electric had injection wells that they used to dispose of toxic chemicals many years ago. Here is EPA's response to our question:

[T]he g[round] w[ater] data for the supply well at the co-generation facility is included in the semi-annual groundwater reports submitted by GE for Groundwater Management Area 3. The recent GMA-3 Reports are on EPA's web page. The supply well is refered to as ASW-5. Attached is the
link to the latest semi-annual groundwater report. The data for ASW-5 is in Appendix C, which begins on page 149 of the pdf and goes through
page 153 of the pdf. Data is included from June 1996 through December 2007. Groundwater samples are collected twice per year. The data
shows that PCBs have never been detected and that low levels of trichloroethene have been detected.
return to top


Top   Sitemap Home